top of page
  • Writer's picture9OM

The story of Reliance vs Amazon, India's biggest retail purchase and an ugly fight.

The US based e-commerce giant Amazon and India's Reliance Industries have been sealed into a raging business fight over the Future group.

The battle is to control India's retail business estimated to reach $1.3 trillion by 2025 , setting off a series of legitimate battles among Amazon and the Future Group. The see-saw fight in court among Amazon and Future have seen challenges and several decisions by legal and quasi-judicial authorities in India started since 2019.

What is at stake?

Future Retail has 1,800 retail locations across 400 towns across India. Amazon, which planned to deliver items in selected towns in the span of two hours of ordering the products, saw Future's stores as peculiar for its delivery plans. Any agreement among Future and Amazon would have given the latter an enormous benefit in customer experience.

And for Reliance, a deal with Future Retail would have entrenched it immovably as India's biggest retailer delivering the products across small cities and towns, additionally helping the e-commerce delivery led by Reliance to deliver goods at small cities as well. Thus, the deal with Future Group would have given Mukesh Ambani a leadership flag in both offline and online retail markets.

Beginning of the tussle: Amazon Vs Reliance

  • Kisore Biyani, who started the hypermarket retail stores ‘Big Bazar’ in 2001 was under immense monetary debt by 2019. Future Group is under the debt of ₹12,778 crore in 2019 and even ICRA put a negative rating on the company.

  • Pushed against, Biyani inked an agreement with Amazon to sell 49% of its unlisted entity, Future Coupons, for more than ₹1,500 crore. The drawn out business agreement gave Amazon the option to buy Future Retail after a period somewhere from three and 10 years, by practicing a "call" choice.

  • This limitation allowed Amazon to practice the choice of acquiring all or a piece of Future Coupon's stake in Future Retail inside 3-10 years of the deal. Future Coupons holds a 7.3% stake in Future Retail, providing Amazon with a roundabout stake of 3.58% in Future Retail because of the agreement with Future Coupons.

  • Such alternatives are ordinarily in an administrative ill-defined situation - permitting foreign entities the chance to hold stakes in areas in which they wouldn't typically be permitted to under the standards.

  • The deal between Amazon and Future group had two major clause:

  1. Amazon has the Right to First Refusal

  2. Non-compete clause, thus restricting the Future's dealings with expected competitors of Amazon, which included Reliance, Walmart, Google, SoftBank, Alibaba, Zomato etc.

And the deal also barrs Future Group from offering any stake to anyone occupied in the food or non-food industry online or in retail.

  • In November 2019, the Competition Commission of India (CCI) additionally supported Amazon's agreement.

  • The Covid-initiated lockdown in 2020 deteriorated Future's situation and by April 2020, Future Retail's sales declined by around 75% from ordinary levels, including tremendous tension in working capital flows.

  • Reliance entered the conflict in May-June 2020 and situated itself as a genuine admirer for Future Retail. Biyani entered an agreement with Reliance Retail, the completely claimed subsidiary of Reliance Industries, in August 2020. The new ₹24,713 crore bargain conceived Future selling its retail, logistics, wholesale and warehousing units to Reliance

What happened in 2020:

  • August 29: Future Retail board endorses Reliance Retail bargain.Reliance Group bought Future Group retail, wholesale and logistics and warehousing units in ₹24,713 crore

  • October 9: Amazon approaches Singapore International Arbitration Centre (SIAC), filed an emergency arbitration case, with Future-Reliance Retail agreement

  • October 25: SIAC observed favor with Amazon's plea with interim award and issued a limiting order against Future, requiring the Future-Reliance Agreement to be postponed.

  • November 7: Future Retail moves Delhi High Court against Amazon charging impedance

  • November 20: The Competition Commission of India (CCI) approved Reliance - Future Agreement

  • December 21: Single-judge seat of Delhi HC declined to allow Future Retail's plea to limit Amazon from keeping in touch with the statutory and regulators about the arbitral honor

The battle: 2021 timeline

  • January 20: Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI) approved the Reliance-Future Retail deal, provoking Amazon to move the high court for authorization of the SIAC administering. This plea asked for the detainment of Kishore Biyani and different overseers of Future Group, other than connection of their resources.

Future Group defended its stance by saying that Amazon's deal was not with Future Retail but rather with Future Coupons, and that thusly, Future Retail was not bound by the intervention. Second, that India's Arbitration Act didn't perceive the component of emergency arbitration awards

  • January 26: The Future-Reliance agreement got contingent endorsement from Sebi and the stock trades. Following endorsement from CCI and no protest from Sebi, Future moved toward National Company Law Tribunal, Mumbai, to hold a meeting with its investors on the plan of amalgamation with Reliance

  • February 2: Single-judge bench of Delhi High Court orders the state of affairs on Future Retail-Reliance Group agreement

  • February 8: Two-judge seat lifts single judge beach’s the state of affairs order on Future Retail Limited - Reliance retail agreement

  • February 22: Conceding Amazon's plea, the Supreme Court discredits NCLT from at long last endorsing any amalgamation (with Reliance) proposed by Future as it gets on track to analyze the legitimacy of the SIAC's emergency order

  • March 18: Delhi HC limits the agreement between Future Retail Limited and Reliance. The court says FRL, Kishore Biyani intentionally and wilfully ignored the order, obligated to face action under the code of civil procedure. It directs to attach the assets of Kishore Biyani, Future Promoter Directors. coordinates assets of Kishore Biyani, Future Promoter Directors to be attached. Asks Future Retail Limited, Future Coupon Private Limited to move toward all controllers to review grant of deal approval

  • March 20: Kishore Biyani questions the order that directs the stay on the FRL and Reliance agreement and the attachments of Kishore Biyani’s assets

  • April 17: Future Retail board supports resolution plan to rebuild got monetary obligation under RBI's August 6, 2020, circular

  • May 19: Reliance Retail Ventures moves NCLT, seeks acknowledgement for the shareholder meeting

  • July 12-20: SIAC last hearing on Amazon application against the FRL and Reliance deal. Judgment expected following a month

  1. NCLT saves order on Reliance Retail appeal for investors call

  2. SC resumes Amazon plea and put a stay on FRL and Reliance deal

  • August 6: The Supreme Court bench, headed by justice Rohinton F Nariman, stated that the Future Group is constrained by the SIAC's emergency award and is enforceable under arbitration law in India.

  • September 9: The Supreme Court took up Future's plea against the single bench order and constrained the Delhi high court from passing any order against Future's agreement with Reliance or on joining the assets of Future's directors and chairman

The latest twist:

The dispute took an astonishing turn on December 17 when CCI suspended its acknowledgement to Amazon's 2019 interest in Future Coupons. Entertaining to the Future Group’s plea, CCI held that Amazon had deceived the commission to accept, through misleading statements and material oversights, that the mix and its motivation were the interest of Amazon in the business of Future Coupons.

CCI observed that Amazon had not revealed the details of the investor understanding at the time of acquisition and its motive was to get rights over Future Retail and to have a foot-step in Indian retail. CCI put its earlier endorsement to the blend in suspension, and Amazon was charged to pay a fine of ₹200 crore for stifling material facts at the hour of looking for CCI's acknowledgement.

CCI's order came as a jolt for Future, which went to SIAC's Delhi tribunal, requesting end of the discretion procedures on the ground that the actual foundation of Amazon's case was eliminated after suspension of the endorsement by CCI. SIAC, chose to proceed with hearing the principal arbitration case, whose agenda had previously been fixed.

In the meantime, Amazon on January 8 filed a plea before the NCLAT (National Company Law Appellate Tribunal) against the CCI request suspending an acknowledgement to its 2019 agreement with Future.

The recent update:

On Feb. 25, Reliance, unexpectedly took the control of Future stores across India, referring to non-installment of lease it was due

On March 3, Amazon expressed a desire for peace during a Supreme Court hearing, saying the "whirlpool" of suit should end and proposed talks which Future consented to.

On March 15,Amazon and Future Group told the court the talks had fizzled. Prior to that day, Amazon ran paper promotions blaming the Indian firms for moving the stores "in a clandestine way by playing a misrepresentation on the Indian Constitution." Reliance hasn't remarked, while Future denies any bad behavior.

Thus, with a range of legal proceedings as yet impending under the watchful eye of the Supreme Court, Delhi high court, National Company Law Tribunal, National Company Law Appellate Tribunal, Competition Commision of India and Singapore International Arbitration Centre, the fight among Reliance and Amazon seethes on.

8 views0 comments


bottom of page